Week 3 Discussion

Read Case 3.2: Battling Over Bottled Water, located on page 109 in your textbook. Nestlé holds a 99-year lease for the land that the Sanctuary Spring sits on. While lease-holders are generally understood to be able to make full use of their land, when public resources are involved, they are limited to “reasonable uses.” Review the case study and formulate an argument either supporting or challenging this distinction. Support your reasoning by addressing key ways in which benefits and burdens are being distributed between Nestlé and the community in this case. DIRECTIONS: To get started, click on the +Pin option on the upper right hand corner and write your response. Click on "How Points Work" to see how you can earn your points. Once you reach 100% you will earn your full 20 points in Blackboard. Please note that points can be deducted if the post is not high quality.

Share: